| Title |
Observation of the effect of gravity on the motion of antimatter
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-023-06527-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. K. Anderson, C. J. Baker, W. Bertsche, N. M. Bhatt, G. Bonomi, A. Capra, I. Carli, C. L. Cesar, M. Charlton, A. Christensen, R. Collister, A. Cridland Mathad, D. Duque Quiceno, S. Eriksson, A. Evans, N. Evetts, S. Fabbri, J. Fajans, A. Ferwerda, T. Friesen, M. C. Fujiwara, D. R. Gill, L. M. Golino, M. B. Gomes Gonçalves, P. Grandemange, P. Granum, J. S. Hangst, M. E. Hayden, D. Hodgkinson, E. D. Hunter, C. A. Isaac, A. J. U. Jimenez, M. A. Johnson, J. M. Jones, S. A. Jones, S. Jonsell, A. Khramov, N. Madsen, L. Martin, N. Massacret, D. Maxwell, J. T. K. McKenna, S. Menary, T. Momose, M. Mostamand, P. S. Mullan, J. Nauta, K. Olchanski, A. N. Oliveira, J. Peszka, A. Powell, C. Ø. Rasmussen, F. Robicheaux, R. L. Sacramento, M. Sameed, E. Sarid, J. Schoonwater, D. M. Silveira, J. Singh, G. Smith, C. So, S. Stracka, G. Stutter, T. D. Tharp, K. A. Thompson, R. I. Thompson, E. Thorpe-Woods, C. Torkzaban, M. Urioni, P. Woosaree, J. S. Wurtele |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 346 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 28 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 6% |
| United States | 21 | 6% |
| Italy | 7 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 6 | 2% |
| Canada | 6 | 2% |
| Spain | 6 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 35 | 10% |
| Unknown | 206 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 285 | 82% |
| Scientists | 52 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 20 | 35% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1695. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,469
of 25,936,091 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#686
of 99,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171
of 361,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#21
of 1,022 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,936,091 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 103.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,022 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.